今天，2007年9月5日，是我第三次到京都。由於今天只有一天的時間，我只能在京都市內較近的地方閒逛起來。這次旅遊的成員包括小慧、我和小熊，所以行程可以如我所願，想去哪就去哪。
拿起常用的那本旅遊書，翻開內容才發現自己去過了很多地方。在這些地方中，如果說要先帶著第一次到日本的小慧去，我一定會選擇清水寺！所以早上買了公車一日卷後，我們就擠上公車，往清水寺前進。
往清水寺的五年阪上十分熱鬧，包括了許多好玩、好吃又美麗的東西。這些東西中，值得一提的有幾間小店。首先是清水阪的琉璃工坊 (大約翻譯)，這一家的東西以髮飾為主，強調以和服花色的琉璃珠做成的特殊髮飾來贏得觀光客的芳心。再往上走，能看到人力車伕等在路邊，等著想試試看人力車的觀光客，雖然我也想試試，但是我們三個人，不能坐同一台車的情況下，只好作罷。
慢慢往清水寺前進的途中，我們也陸續地逛了一些店家，但特產總不在我們的焦點範圍內，所以其他的玩具，像是扇子、京人偶等反而是我們止步很久的焦點，也是小熊非常受不了的情形。好不容易，在邊走邊玩的情形下，我們到了清水寺的門口；這時的小熊，卻因熱與悶的天氣，感到十分的不耐煩。
2007/09/05
2007/06/01
2007/05/22
2007/05/08
整理整理...
開始思索我目前有的資料...
應該可以裝成一箱一箱的了...
第一大箱：無尾港資料集
第二大箱：崙埤資料集
第三大箱：關渡資料集
第四大箱：其他的保護區資料集
第五大箱：國際保護區與保育資料
第六大箱：相關計畫執行資料集-1 2005國科會 (大專生+老師)
第七大箱：相關計畫執行資料集-2 傳統領域
第八大箱：相關計畫執行資料集-3 宜蘭縣政府計畫
第九大箱：PAPER整理-1 經營管理效能評估
第十大箱：PAPER整理-2 保護區相關文獻
第十一大箱：PAPER整理-3 森林相關文獻
第十二大箱：PAPER整理-4 方法論相關文獻
第十三大箱：PAPER整理-5 測量、航遙測、決策系統
第十四大箱：PAPER整理-6 其他
第十五大箱：其他不在研究範圍內，但有興趣的東東
應該可以裝成一箱一箱的了...
第一大箱：無尾港資料集
第二大箱：崙埤資料集
第三大箱：關渡資料集
第四大箱：其他的保護區資料集
第五大箱：國際保護區與保育資料
第六大箱：相關計畫執行資料集-1 2005國科會 (大專生+老師)
第七大箱：相關計畫執行資料集-2 傳統領域
第八大箱：相關計畫執行資料集-3 宜蘭縣政府計畫
第九大箱：PAPER整理-1 經營管理效能評估
第十大箱：PAPER整理-2 保護區相關文獻
第十一大箱：PAPER整理-3 森林相關文獻
第十二大箱：PAPER整理-4 方法論相關文獻
第十三大箱：PAPER整理-5 測量、航遙測、決策系統
第十四大箱：PAPER整理-6 其他
第十五大箱：其他不在研究範圍內，但有興趣的東東
2007/04/21
Arugment 170 練習
The argument's conclusion is that if Gulf Coast's oyster producers start to use new methods to kill the bacteria, there will be greater profits to Gulf Coast oyster producers. I think it is good to listen the new method for killing bacteria, but the argument still unconvincing. Here is why.
First, the author claims that consumers would like to pay twice as much for oysters form the northeastern Atlantic Coast as for Gulf Coast oysters because of the bacteria. Obviously, the author's assumption is that the qualities are the same both on northeastern Atlantic Coast and Gulf Coast oysters. Maybe the price of the oysters form the northeastern Atlantic Coast is higher that Gulf Coast in normal. The bacteria only decrease a little price for Gulf Coast's oysters.
Second, even there is a new method for killing harmful bacteria, but does not mention that the consumers would accept the oysters through the process of killing bacteria. If the new method is using X-ray to killing the bacteria, there is no customers will interesting the oysters which are processed.
Third, as the author says, if the Gulf Coast oyster producers using the new method for killing bacteria, they will have great profit. Is it true? As a graduated student with a minor in Economics, I would like to say the answer is no. Actually, if there are more and more oysters in the market, with the same demand, the price will decrease. Further, the consumer would treat the oysters which are processed as lower class products than the oysters from northeastern Atlantic Coast, and ask for lower price to buy the oysters from Gulf Coast oysters.
Last, we should care about that the author only describes the behavior of consumers in California, but his conclusion is for everyone, not just in the California. It will be a big problem if he suggests the Gulf Coast oyster producers to use the new method.
First, the author claims that consumers would like to pay twice as much for oysters form the northeastern Atlantic Coast as for Gulf Coast oysters because of the bacteria. Obviously, the author's assumption is that the qualities are the same both on northeastern Atlantic Coast and Gulf Coast oysters. Maybe the price of the oysters form the northeastern Atlantic Coast is higher that Gulf Coast in normal. The bacteria only decrease a little price for Gulf Coast's oysters.
Second, even there is a new method for killing harmful bacteria, but does not mention that the consumers would accept the oysters through the process of killing bacteria. If the new method is using X-ray to killing the bacteria, there is no customers will interesting the oysters which are processed.
Third, as the author says, if the Gulf Coast oyster producers using the new method for killing bacteria, they will have great profit. Is it true? As a graduated student with a minor in Economics, I would like to say the answer is no. Actually, if there are more and more oysters in the market, with the same demand, the price will decrease. Further, the consumer would treat the oysters which are processed as lower class products than the oysters from northeastern Atlantic Coast, and ask for lower price to buy the oysters from Gulf Coast oysters.
Last, we should care about that the author only describes the behavior of consumers in California, but his conclusion is for everyone, not just in the California. It will be a big problem if he suggests the Gulf Coast oyster producers to use the new method.
訂閱：
意見 (Atom)
